3 research outputs found

    Comparison of content and psychometric properties for assessment tools used for brain tumor patients : a scoping review

    Get PDF
    Funding Information: This study was supported by Riga StradiņŔ University internal grant. Publisher Copyright: Ā© 2021, The Author(s).Aims: To determine the most frequently utilized functional status assessment instruments for patients with brain tumors, compare their contents, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and their psychometric properties. Methods: A scoping review was conducted to explore possible assessment instruments and summarize theĀ evidence.Ā A systematic literature search was performed for identification of the frequently used functional assessment tool in clinical trials in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest databases. The content of most used instruments was linked to the ICF categories. The psychometric qualities of these assessment tools were systematically searched and analyzed. Results: Nine most used assessment tools in clinical trials were identified. The most frequently used assessment instrument is the Karnofsky Performance Scale, which is developed for aĀ general assessment of oncological patients. Out of four self-assessment tools, two were disease-specific (EORTC QLQ-BN20 and FACT-Br), EORTC QLQ-C30 has been shown good psychometric properties in patients with brain tumors as well as in patients with various oncological diseases, similar to the SF-36, it is used in patients with brain tumors as well as in patients with various diseases. The Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel Index were two objective assessment tools that described functioning, but two were neuropsychological tests (MMSE and Trial Making Test). Two hundred eighty-three meaningful concepts were identified and linked to 102 most relevant second-level categories covering all components of the ICF. Forty-nine studies reporting psychometric properties of those nine assessment tools were identified, indicating good reliability and validity for all the instruments. Conclusion: Nine most frequently utilized functional status assessment instruments for patients with brain tumors represent all components of the ICF and have good psychometric properties. However, the choice of the tool depends on the clinical question posed and the aim of its use.publishersversionPeer reviewe

    Interventions in acute neuro-oncological rehabilitation:scoping review

    No full text
    RehabilitācijaVeselÄ«bas aprÅ«peRehabilitationHealth CarePētāmā problēma: Lai nodroÅ”inātu vienlÄ«dzÄ«gu pieejamÄ«bu rehabilitācijai visiem, kam tā ir nepiecieÅ”ama, ir jābÅ«t vienotai un efektÄ«vai stratēģijai pacientu ārstÄ“Å”anā. Darba mērÄ·is: Identificēt pierādÄ«jumus visbiežāk izmantotajām rehabilitācijas intervencēm, kas var tikt izmantotas neiro-onkoloÄ£isku pacientu akÅ«tajā rehabilitācijā. Metodes: Lai sasniegtu izvirzÄ«to pētnieciskā darba mērÄ·i, tika veikts darbÄ«bas jomu noteikÅ”anas pārskats. Tas sastāvēja no trÄ«s daļām: intervenču identificÄ“Å”anas publikācijās; intervenču sasaistes ar Starptautisko medicÄ«niskās iejaukÅ”anās veidu klasifikāciju (ICHI); problēmu, uz kurām Ŕīs intervences tiek vērstas, identificÄ“Å”anu un sasaisti ar SFK kategorijām. Rezultāti: Kopumā, pielietojot meklÄ“Å”anas stratēģiju, tika atlasÄ«ti 1144 raksti. Pārskatā tika iekļautas 43 publikācijas. Kopumā Å”ajās publikācijās tika identificētas 38 unikālas intervences. ICHI klasifikācijā izdevās identificēt 34 intervences. Četras no identificētajām intervencēm bija ar I pierādÄ«jumu lÄ«meni, 11 ar II, 19 ā€“ ar III un 4 ā€“ ar IV pierādÄ«jumu lÄ«meni. TrÄ«s no 38 identificētajām intervencēm tiek vērstas uz traucējumu mazināŔanu atbilstoÅ”i SFK nodaļu lÄ«menim (pirmā lÄ«meņa klasifikācija), 27 - uz bojājumu mazināŔanu Ä·ermeņa funkciju lÄ«menÄ« (otrā lÄ«meņa klasifikācija), savukārt 6 ā€“ uz ierobežojumu mazināŔanu aktivitāŔu un dalÄ«bas lÄ«menÄ« (otrā lÄ«meņa klasifikācija). Rezultātu analÄ«ze: Pārskatā ir pierādÄ«ts, ka, lai gan rehabilitācijas uzdevums ir aktivitāŔu un dalÄ«bas uzlaboÅ”ana, literatÅ«rā intervences lielākoties ir vērstas uz Ä·ermeņa funkciju uzlaboÅ”anu un iespējams, tikai pastarpināti ietekmē aktivitātes un dalÄ«bu. Pārskatā identificētās intervences atbilst intervencēm, kas ir atrodamas pasaules vadlÄ«nijās darbam ar neiro-onkoloÄ£iskiem pacientiem. Secinājumi: Starptautiskā zinātniskā literatÅ«rā ir pierādÄ«jumi par 38 intervencēm, ko dažādi rehabilitācijas profesionāļi var izmantot neiroloÄ£isko pacientu akÅ«tajā rehabilitācijā. Tomēr, lielākajai daļai Å”o intervenču ir II un III lÄ«meņa pierādÄ«jumi. AtbilstoÅ”i ICHI struktÅ«rai, 22 no identificētajām intervencēm ietilpst Ķermeņa struktÅ«ru un funkciju sadaļā, 10 - AktivitāŔu un dalÄ«bas sadaļā, pa vienai, attiecÄ«gi Vides un VeselÄ«bas uzvedÄ«bas sadaļās. Četras intervences (virtuālā realitāte, spoguļterapija, robotizēts augŔējo ekstremitāŔu treniņŔ funkciju uzlaboÅ”anai un kognitÄ«vā grupu terapija) nav iekļautas ICHI. LiteratÅ«rā analizētās problēmas, uz kurām tiek vērstas intervences, bieži nesakrÄ«t ar konkrētās intervences mērÄ·i vai ir pārāk plaÅ”i definētas un nav specifiskas.Research problem: To ensure equal access to rehabilitation for those who need it, there needs to be an effective treatment strategy developed for neuro-oncological patients. Aim of the study: To identify evidence for interventions used in acute rehabilitation for patients with neuro-oncological disease. Methods: A scoping review was conducted and consisted of three parts: identification of interventions in publications; linking interventions to ICHI classification (International Classification of Health Interventions), identifying problems targeted by these interventions and linking them to the ICF categories. Results: A total of 1144 articles were selected using the search strategy, after applying inclusion criteria 43 publications were included in the report. In total 108 interventions were identified, 38 of them were unique interventions. 34 of the interventions were classified in the ICHI classification. Four interventions of the ICHI identified interventions were evidence level I, eleven interventions were evidence level II, nineteen evidence level III and four interventions with evidence level IV. Three interventions were linked with the ICF in chapter level (first level classification),27 interventions were linked with body functions domains; however, 6 interventions were linked with activities and participation domains. Discussion: This report shows that although rehabilitation works with activities and participation, the literature shows that interventions are mostly covering body functions section in the ICHI. The interventions identified in the report are in line with those found in global guidelines for neuro-oncological patients. Conclusion: There is evidence in scientific literature of 38 interventions that can be used by various rehabilitation professionals in the acute rehabilitation of neuro-oncological patients. However, most of these interventions are evidence level II and III. According to the ICHI, 22 of identified interventions are classified into Body Structures and Functions section, 10 into the Activities and Participation section, one in each Environmental and Health-related Behavior sections. Four interventions (virtual reality, mirror therapy, robotic upper extremity training to improve function, and cognitive group therapy) are not included in the ICHI. The problems analyzed in the literature that target interventions often do not coincide with the purpose of the specific intervention or are too broadly defined and not specific

    Legal regulation problematic aspects of the bankruptcy procedure and the cancellation procedure in the physical person insolvency process

    No full text
    LÄ«dz ar 2010.gada 26.jÅ«lija Maksātnespējas likuma spēkā stāŔanos, ievērojami ir pieaudzis ierosināto un pasludināto fizisko personu maksātnespējas lietu skaits. Tas ir izskaidrojams ar jaunā likuma grozÄ«jumiem, kura ietvaros fiziskās personas maksātnespējas process tiek sadalÄ«ts divās savstarpēji atŔķirÄ«gās stadijās - bankrota procedÅ«rā un saistÄ«bu dzÄ“Å”anas procedÅ«rā. MaÄ£istra darbs ā€žBankrota procedÅ«ras un saistÄ«bu dzÄ“Å”anas procedÅ«ras tiesiskā regulējuma problemātiskie aspekti fiziskās personas maksātnespējas procesāā€ ir padziļināts pētÄ«jums, kura mērÄ·is ir analizēt bankrota procedÅ«ras un saistÄ«bu dzÄ“Å”anas procedÅ«ras tiesisko regulējumu, identificēt pastāvoŔās problēmas, kā arÄ« sniegt priekÅ”likumus to risināŔanai. Darbā tiek aplÅ«koti bankrota procedÅ«ras un saistÄ«bu dzÄ“Å”anas procedÅ«ras jēdzieni un mērÄ·i, tiek analizēts bankrota procedÅ«ras un saistÄ«bu dzÄ“Å”anas procedÅ«ras tiesiskais regulējums, Ä«paÅ”u uzmanÄ«bu pievērÅ”ot administratora un parādnieka statusam, tiek pētÄ«tas atŔķirÄ«bas starp bankrota procedÅ«ras pabeigÅ”anas un izbeigÅ”anas sekām, kā arÄ« aplÅ«kotas saistÄ«bu dzÄ“Å”anas procedÅ«ras izbeigÅ”anas sekas. Autore pētÄ«jumam ir izmantojusi analÄ«tisko, salÄ«dzinoÅ”o un induktÄ«vās pētÄ«Å”anas metodi, teorētiskās un empÄ«riskās metodes pamatprincipus, kā arÄ« veikusi tiesÄ«bu normu sistēmisko, gramatisko un teleoloÄ£isko tulkoÅ”anas metodi. Darba noslēgumā tiek izdarÄ«ti secinājumi un sniegti priekÅ”likumi fiziskās personas maksātnespējas procesa optimizācijai un tiesiskā regulējuma uzlaboÅ”anai. Atslēgvārdi: fiziska persona, maksātnespējas process, bankrota procedÅ«ra, saistÄ«bu dzÄ“Å”anas procedÅ«ra, administrators, parādnieks, kreditors.On 26 July 2010, the new insolvency law was accepted. Due to this law restructure, the number of physical personsā€™ insolvency applications and the number of their proclaimed insolvency cases are sharply increased. According to modifications, the insolvency procedure of physical persons is divided into two different stages - bankruptcy and debt settlement procedures. These changes are expected to result in more operative proceedings and easier procedureā€™s access for physical persons. The master thesis ā€œProblematic aspects of bankruptcy and debt settlement procedures in the process of physical personā€™s insolvency proceedingsā€ is an in-depth research with objectives to analyse the bankruptcy and debt settlement procedures, to identify main imperfections of both procedures and to present possible improvements and recommendations with the aim to improve insolvency procedures. The thesis is focused not only on the investigation of main concepts and objectives of bankruptcy and debt settlement procedures but also on legal regulations of both procedures particularly concentrating on insolvency administratorā€™s and debtorā€™s statuses. A vital part of the thesis is dedicated to the analyse of debt settlement procedure closure partsā€™ consequences and to the comparison between consequences of bankruptcy procedures proceedings, namely, bankruptcy termination and its closure. In order to gather data, the author has applied various information collection approaches such as the analytical, the comparative and the inductive investigation methods. Fundamental principles of theoretic and empiric methods and legal normsā€™ systematic, grammatical and theological translationā€™s methodologies are employed. In the final part, conclusions and suggestions regarding the physical personsā€™ insolvency procedure are presented in order to optimize the insolvency process and improve the legal regulations. Key words: physical person, insolvency process, bankruptcy procedure, debt settlement procedure, administrator, debtor, creditor
    corecore